What I attempted to do with this essay is combine some of my thought in essay 1 with essay 4 about electronic writing and develop a new thesis. I wrote about my views on electronic text and how it has changed because of “All Roads” and “Physics for Scientists and Engineers” and that Birkerts and Graffs views should be changed because of works like these. Whether there views would back up my two examples of electronic text and how reading is powerful and engages the mind. I also talked about technology evolving books. I focused on engaging to back up my points on interactive programs like “All Roads.”
I revised the essday by taking points from both essays I feel could be joined together and switching more of my views from essay one because it wads done back in February. My views on electronic reading as you can see from when you read my essay have changed.
I feel I achieved my goal of making this essay not be repetitive like essay four.
I believe I achieved in proving that Birkert and Graff views should change slightly because of these electronic texts do what they think they can’t do. I feel the goal I made in the beginning of the class to improve my thesis statements and organization of my information I have improved on.
As a writer I know feel more prepared to writing essays whether its on a book, movie or comparing things I feel this class has prepared me. I will continue to work on my writing for the next coming years at WAC and feel you can never stop improving. I think expanding my vocabulary will make my essay flow better like in the final project. I will continue to work on my thesis statements and organizing my thoughts.
